- Privacy
- Terms
- Stay Connected
The morning sun casts long shadows across weathered asphalt as it climbs over the Superstition Mountains. Here, along a quiet stretch of road between Apache Junction and Globe, time seems suspended between eras. Faded Burma-Shave signs, crumbling motor courts, and abandoned service stations punctuate the landscape—silent witnesses to the golden age of American highway travel. This is U.S. Route 60, once a vital artery connecting Arizona to the nation, now largely bypassed and forgotten in the shadow of interstate highways. Yet in its weathered remains lies a rich tapestry of Arizona’s transportation history, economic development, and the dramatic story of how changing travel patterns created and then abandoned communities along its path.
Behind the engineering specifications, economic statistics, and political decisions that shaped Route 60 were countless human stories—the highway workers who physically built the road, the business owners who staked their livelihoods on its traffic, and the travelers who experienced Arizona through its corridor.
The construction of Route 60, particularly during its major improvement phases in the 1930s, provided crucial employment during the Great Depression. Work crews, often organized through New Deal programs like the Works Progress Administration, included a diverse workforce drawing from local communities along the route. Payroll records preserved in the Arizona State Archives reveal the economic impact of these projects: in December 1934, the Salt River Canyon Bridge project employed 143 men, many from nearby mining communities where operations had scaled back during the economic downturn.
Oral histories collected from highway workers document the physically demanding conditions they faced. Manuel Gonzales, who worked on Route 60 improvements near Miami in 1936, recalled: “We used picks and shovels for much of the work, with only limited machinery. In summer heat reaching 110 degrees, men would sometimes collapse, but jobs were so scarce that ten men would be waiting to take your place if you couldn’t continue.” These laborers not only built transportation infrastructure but also developed specialized skills that would later support Arizona’s post-war construction boom.
Business owners along the route developed intimate knowledge of traveler patterns and preferences. Emma Wilson, who operated the Superstition Mountain Lodge near Apache Junction from 1947 to 1972, maintained detailed guest registers that tracked changing travel patterns. Her records show the shift from predominantly regional travelers in the immediate post-war years to an increasingly national and international clientele by the 1960s, reflecting the democratization of long-distance auto tourism. Wilson’s business notes also document adaptation strategies as travel patterns evolved: “Added air conditioning to all cabins this summer (1953). California guests especially demand this comfort now, and will drive to the next town if not provided.”
For travelers, Route 60 offered both challenges and memorable experiences. Wallace Manning, whose unpublished memoir “Crossing Arizona: 1937” resides in the Arizona Historical Society archives, described the highway as “a journey through multiple worlds in a single day.” His account details the dramatic transitions from the cool pine forests around Show Low to the scorching desert west of Phoenix, with stops in mining towns, trading posts, and roadside cafes that collectively created a vivid impression of Arizona’s diversity.
Indigenous perspectives on the highway add important dimensions to its human story. Oral histories from White Mountain Apache tribal members describe how Route 60’s development through the reservation brought economic opportunities through tourism and improved access to markets for tribal enterprises, while simultaneously introducing challenges including increased non-Native presence on traditional lands and environmental impacts from road construction. Philip Cassadore, a tribal elder interviewed in 1989, noted that the highway “brought the outside world closer, for better and worse—making it easier to sell our crafts but harder to maintain our traditions without outside influence.”
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Name | U.S. Route 60 (Route 60) |
| Established | 1926 |
| Purpose | To provide a major east-west highway connecting the Atlantic Coast with the Southwest and West, facilitating trade, travel, and economic development. |
| Route | – Originally planned as a coast-to-coast highway, it now runs from Virginia Beach, Virginia, to Brenda, Arizona. |
| – Passes through 9 states: Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri, Illinois, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. | |
| Length | Approximately 2,670 miles |
| Eastern Terminus | Virginia Beach, Virginia |
| Western Terminus | Brenda, Arizona (near Interstate 10) |
| Major Cities Along Route | – Virginia Beach, VA |
| – Richmond, VA | |
| – Charleston, WV | |
| – Lexington, KY | |
| – St. Louis, MO | |
| – Tulsa, OK | |
| – Amarillo, TX | |
| – Albuquerque, NM | |
| – Globe, AZ | |
| Historical Significance | – Originally part of the U.S. Highway System created in 1926 to standardize and connect major roads across the country. |
| – Played a vital role in early east-west travel before the Interstate Highway System. | |
| Terrain | – Passes through diverse terrains, including Appalachian Mountains, Midwestern plains, deserts, and Southwest plateaus. |
| Changes to Route | – Originally planned as a transcontinental route extending to Los Angeles, California, but the western portion was replaced by U.S. Route 66. |
| – Now ends in Arizona, becoming less significant in the West due to Interstate highways. | |
| Modern Role | – Still serves as a major regional highway for many areas, particularly in the eastern and central portions of its route. |
| Connection to Arizona | – In Arizona, Route 60 runs westward from Springerville through towns such as Globe, Superior, and Wickenburg, ending at Brenda. |
| – Provides access to scenic areas, such as the Salt River Canyon and the Tonto National Forest. | |
| Cultural Impact | – Boosted local economies by connecting rural towns to larger cities. |
| – Inspired roadside businesses and attractions during its peak years. | |
| Modern Status | – Still in use, though much of its original importance has been supplanted by the Interstate Highway System (e.g., I-40 and I-10). |
| – Portions of Route 60 are designated as scenic routes and are popular with tourists and travelers. |
Long before asphalt and concrete carved through Arizona’s diverse landscapes, indigenous peoples established intricate trail networks connecting settlements, water sources, and trading partners across the region. Many of these ancient pathways followed natural contours and water courses that would, centuries later, influence the routing of modern transportation corridors including what became U.S. Route 60.
The formal beginnings of Route 60 emerged from the early 20th century Good Roads Movement, when automobile advocacy groups and local governments began pushing for improved highways to connect America’s growing population of motorists. In 1926, when the U.S. Highway System was officially established, Route 60 was designated as a major east-west corridor intended to stretch from Virginia Beach, Virginia to Los Angeles, California.
However, political disputes complicated the highway’s development, particularly in the western states. Originally, the number 60 was assigned to what is now largely U.S. 66, but Kentucky representatives successfully argued that their state deserved a “0” route. After prolonged negotiation, what is now Route 60 through Arizona was initially designated as U.S. Route 70 before finally receiving its permanent number in 1933.
Within Arizona, the fully realized Route 60 ultimately stretched approximately 369 miles from the New Mexico border near Springerville to the California state line at Ehrenberg, traversing an impressive range of the state’s diverse environments. From the pine forests of the White Mountains, through the Sonoran Desert surrounding Phoenix, across the expanse of the western desert, the highway provided one of the most scenically varied drives in the national highway system.
What distinguished Route 60 from other early highways was its unusual diversity of purposes. While roads like Route 66 served primarily as long-distance transportation corridors, Route 60 functioned simultaneously as a transcontinental route, a mining access road connecting Globe and Superior to broader markets, a gateway to recreational areas in the Tonto National Forest, and an essential connection between agricultural communities in central Arizona. This multifaceted role gave the highway a distinctive character that can still be sensed in its remaining original segments.
Today’s traveler seeking the ghost of historic Route 60 will find a highway that exists in multiple states of preservation and transformation. Unlike Route 66, which was largely decommissioned within Arizona, significant portions of Route 60 remain part of the active state highway system, though often in widened, realigned, or substantially modified form.
The most authentic segments of original Route 60 can be found in eastern Arizona between Springerville and Show Low, where the road retains much of its historical character as a two-lane highway winding through small communities and forests. Several sections feature the distinctive concrete paving with expansion joints placed at regular intervals—a construction style typical of 1930s highway engineering that creates the rhythmic thump-thump familiar to generations of road travelers.
Between Miami and Superior, the highway traverses the dramatic Devil’s Canyon, where engineering necessities created one of the route’s most impressive sections. Here, the road clings to steep mountainsides, crossing numerous bridges and offering spectacular views. The original 1920s alignment, known locally as the “Claypool-Miami Highway,” included hair-raising switchbacks and narrow passages that tested early motorists’ courage and vehicles’ capabilities. Modern improvements have straightened many curves, but observant travelers can still spot segments of the original roadbed below the current alignment, abandoned to erosion and desert vegetation.
Physical infrastructure from the highway’s heyday remains scattered along the route in various states of preservation. The Salt River Canyon Bridge, completed in 1934, stands as perhaps the most impressive engineering feature. This steel arch structure spans the dramatic canyon 497 feet above the Salt River, connecting the Fort Apache Reservation to the mining communities beyond. Recognized on the National Register of Historic Places, the bridge exemplifies the ambitious engineering that transformed Arizona’s transportation landscape during the Great Depression, when many highway improvements were constructed through public works programs.
Smaller structures tell equally important stories about the highway’s evolution. Near Florence, a series of concrete box culverts bearing Arizona Highway Department stamps from 1934 demonstrate standardized designs deployed across the state system. Outside Wickenburg, original guardrails constructed from locally quarried stone reflect early highway safety features that harmonized with the surrounding landscape rather than imposing industrial materials on natural settings.
Perhaps most evocative are the roadside ruins—abandoned businesses that once served Route 60 travelers but couldn’t survive changing traffic patterns. The skeletal remains of service stations, their pumps long removed and canopies collapsed, stand as silent sentinels along rural stretches. Former motor courts, with their distinctive cabin layouts and parking configurations, hint at an era when cross-country travel necessitated frequent overnight stops. Many have been repurposed as long-term residency motels or abandoned entirely, their swimming pools filled with sand and neon signs dark for half a century.
The relationship between Route 60 and the communities it served reveals a complex story of economic opportunity, adaptation, and in some cases, abandonment. Unlike some highways that generated entirely new settlements, Route 60 primarily connected existing communities established during Arizona’s territorial mining and agricultural development. Its arrival, however, transformed these places by connecting them to the emerging automotive transportation network.
Superior provides a particularly compelling example of a mining community whose relationship with Route 60 evolved dramatically over time. Originally developed around the Magma Copper Mine, the town’s economy centered on resource extraction rather than highway commerce. When the original Route 60 was routed directly through Superior’s downtown in the 1920s, local businesses adapted to serve passing motorists while maintaining their primary focus on the mining population.
The construction of the Queen Creek Tunnel and a new highway alignment in 1952, however, allowed through traffic to bypass Superior’s business district. This realignment, though only shifting the highway a few blocks, had devastating economic consequences for downtown establishments that had come to depend on tourist traffic. Today, the contrast between the abandoned storefronts along the original route and newer businesses clustered around the current alignment illustrates how even minor highway adjustments could fundamentally reshape community fortunes.
Other settlements sprang up specifically to serve highway travelers. Dateland, located in the sparsely populated desert between Gila Bend and Yuma, emerged as a classic “service town” with its existence predicated entirely on the needs of Route 60 motorists. Its famous date shakes became a tourist attraction in themselves, giving travelers a reason to stop in an otherwise desolate stretch. When Interstate 8 replaced this section of Route 60, Dateland managed the rare feat of successfully relocating its operations to the new highway interchange, demonstrating the adaptability that determined whether highway-dependent businesses would survive transportation evolutions.
Not all communities proved so fortunate. Sidon, a small settlement between Wenden and Salome, virtually disappeared when highway realignments diverted traffic away from its handful of businesses. Today, only concrete foundations and a few deteriorating structures mark what was once a welcome rest stop for travelers crossing the western Arizona desert. Similarly, Costello, once home to a popular highway-side diner between Florence and Phoenix, has been reduced to little more than a place name on historical maps after being bypassed by the more direct modern alignment.
The communities that successfully weathered highway transitions typically shared key characteristics: economic diversity beyond road services, adaptation to changing traveler expectations, and eventual proximity to interstate interchanges. Those that failed generally suffered from over-dependence on through traffic, inability to relocate when alignments changed, or economic foundations that were already weakening when highway patterns shifted.
The evolution of roadside services along Route 60 mirrors the broader development of American road culture throughout the 20th century. From the primitive beginnings when cross-country travelers carried their own gasoline in metal cans and camped alongside the road, to the sophisticated service plazas of the mid-century, the highway’s amenities reflected changing traveler expectations and technological capabilities.
Early services were typically simple and locally owned, often operated as sidelines to other businesses. A general store might add a single gas pump, a ranch house could spare a room for overnight travelers, and a local cafe might extend hours to serve motorists passing through. These improvised services gradually evolved into purpose-built establishments designed specifically for the highway trade.
By the 1930s, specialized roadside architecture had emerged along Route 60, with distinctive building forms that communicated their functions to approaching motorists. Gas stations adopted standardized layouts with prominent canopies visible from a distance, often incorporating regional architectural elements like adobe construction or Western motifs to create a sense of place. Motor courts—the predecessors to modern motels—replaced informal tourist camps, offering individual cabins arranged in U or L configurations around central parking areas.
The roadside dining landscape similarly evolved from local cafes to establishments catering specifically to motorist preferences. Valentine Diner buildings—prefabricated structures manufactured in Wichita, Kansas and shipped to highway locations—appeared at several points along Route 60, offering standardized menus in compact buildings designed for highway visibility. Several of these distinctive buildings survive today, though repurposed for other uses after their dining operations ceased.
Roadside attractions emerged to entice travelers to stop in otherwise overlooked communities. The ostrich farm at Picacho Peak, though primarily oriented toward travelers on the parallel U.S. 80, drew Route 60 motorists through creative signage and promotion. In Florence, the Tom Mix Memorial marked the location where the famous Western movie star died in a 1940 auto accident on Route 60, transforming a tragedy into a tourist stop that complemented the town’s historic downtown.
The most distinctive services developed in response to Route 60’s unique environmental challenges. The highway’s dramatic elevation changes—from over 9,000 feet near Springerville to just 475 feet at Ehrenberg—created exceptional demands on early vehicles. Specialized radiator service stations emerged at the bases of steep grades, offering cooling water and repair services for overheated engines. Auto repair garages near mountain passages stocked specific parts known to fail on the demanding terrain, creating a specialized service economy responding directly to the highway’s particular challenges.
Contemporary newspaper coverage provides invaluable insights into how Route 60 transformed Arizona communities and connected previously isolated regions. The highway’s development, ongoing improvements, and role in both daily life and emergency situations received extensive attention in publications both local and national.
The Arizona Republic chronicled the political maneuvering behind Route 60’s designation, including the complex negotiations that resulted in the route’s final numbering and alignment. A March 1933 article reported: “Arizona’s east-west highway, formerly designated as U.S. 70 and before that as the Apache Trail and Ocean-to-Ocean Highway, will henceforth be known as U.S. Route 60, providing transcontinental travelers a year-round central corridor across the nation.” This simple administrative change signified Arizona’s integration into the standardized national highway network, with all the economic benefits that entailed.
Local newspapers documented the immediate economic impacts of highway improvements. The Superior Sun reported in 1937 that “gasoline sales have increased 42 percent since the completion of the new highway alignment, with four new businesses under construction to serve the growing number of motorists passing through our community.” Similar reports from newspapers in Globe, Miami, Wickenburg, and other Route 60 communities tracked the economic transformation brought by improved automotive access.
Highway dangers and disasters received particularly detailed coverage. The White Mountain Independent provided extensive reporting on the challenges of winter travel through the mountain sections, with vivid accounts of stranded motorists, heroic rescues, and the gradual improvements in snow removal techniques that made year-round travel increasingly reliable. The Florence Blade detailed the famous 1940 auto accident that claimed the life of movie star Tom Mix on Route 60 south of Florence, transforming a routine travel tragedy into front-page news across the nation.
Weather emergencies highlighted the highway’s vulnerability and crucial importance. During the devastating floods of 1970, when bridges along Route 60 were damaged or destroyed, the Arizona Republic published daily updates on repair progress and alternate routing, emphasizing how central the highway had become to communication and commerce despite the development of the interstate system. The Salt River Canyon Bridge, temporarily the only crossing available after other routes were severed, became a lifeline for isolated communities, demonstrating the ongoing importance of the historic highway network even as newer transportation corridors developed.
Perhaps most poignantly, local publications documented the gradual bypassing of Route 60 communities as interstate highways diverted traffic. The Wickenburg Sun chronicled the declining traffic counts and business closures along the town’s historic main street after Interstate 10 provided a faster route between Phoenix and California. A 1978 editorial lamented: “Progress provides faster journeys for those passing through, but at what cost to the communities built around serving travelers who now speed past without ever seeing our main street?”
The development of the Interstate Highway System beginning in the late 1950s fundamentally altered Route 60’s role in Arizona’s transportation network. As higher-speed, limited-access highways paralleled portions of the historic route, traffic patterns shifted dramatically, initiating a gradual decline in the highway’s prominence and economic impact.
Interstate 10 delivered the first major blow, providing a faster alternative between Phoenix and California that diverted much of the through traffic that had previously followed Route 60 through Wickenburg and western Arizona. Between 1968 and 1972, traffic counts on Route 60 through Wickenburg fell by approximately 60%, devastating businesses dependent on highway travelers.
The completion of Interstate 17 between Phoenix and Flagstaff similarly impacted the eastern segments of Route 60, providing a more direct route to northern Arizona that bypassed the Show Low and Springerville corridor. While Interstate 17 didn’t precisely parallel Route 60, it captured much of the recreational traffic heading to the White Mountains, altering travel patterns that had sustained highway businesses for decades.
Even where direct interstate competition didn’t exist, modernization efforts often bypassed historic alignments. The construction of the Superstition Freeway (now part of U.S. 60 but built to interstate standards) between Phoenix and Apache Junction created a high-speed alternative to the original two-lane highway, leaving the historic “Main Street” alignment through communities like Mesa and Apache Junction with drastically reduced traffic. Businesses along these bypassed segments faced difficult choices: relocate to the new alignment, adapt to serve local rather than through traffic, or close entirely.
The human and community impacts of these transitions were profound. Census data reveals population declines in several small communities along bypassed segments during the 1970s and 1980s, while newspaper accounts document the closure of iconic businesses that had served highway travelers for generations. The Buckhorn Bar in Mesa, a landmark on the original Route 60 alignment since 1938, closed in 1981 after traffic shifted to the new Superstition Freeway, with owner Stella McGee telling the Mesa Tribune: “The highway gave us life, and taking away the highway took that life away.”
Physical evidence of this decline remains visible in the commercial landscapes of bypassed sections. Along the original alignment through Apache Junction, a series of mid-century motels and restaurants sit vacant or repurposed, their distinctive architecture—designed specifically for highway visibility—now incongruous with current land uses. Signs advertising services to travelers who no longer pass by gradually weathered and faded, creating the visual archaeology of transportation evolution that characterizes ghost highways throughout the American West.
Not all communities suffered equally from these transitions. Those with diverse economic foundations beyond highway services, like Globe with its continued mining operations, weathered the changes more successfully. Others effectively reinvented themselves—Superior has gradually developed a heritage tourism economy capitalizing on both its mining history and its location as a gateway to the Boyce Thompson Arboretum State Park, transforming from a highway service town to a destination in its own right.
While Route 60 lacks the organized preservation movement and popular recognition enjoyed by Route 66, growing awareness of historic highways has sparked efforts to document, commemorate, and in some cases preserve segments of this important transportation corridor before they disappear entirely.
The most comprehensive documentation comes from the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER), which has recorded significant engineering features along Route 60, including detailed documentation of the Salt River Canyon Bridge. These records, maintained by the Library of Congress, provide precise architectural and engineering information about key structures, creating a permanent archive even for features that may not physically survive.
At the state level, the Arizona Department of Transportation has incorporated historic highway documentation into cultural resource management practices, particularly when modern transportation projects impact original alignments or associated structures. Their “Historic Highway Infrastructure of Arizona” contextual study identified significant surviving segments and established evaluation criteria for determining historical importance, creating a framework for preservation decisions.
Several communities have embraced their Route 60 heritage as part of local identity and tourism development. Miami and Globe highlight their historic main streets—once the primary Route 60 alignment—through heritage tourism initiatives that emphasize both mining history and transportation heritage. Superior’s annual “Mining, Miners, and Minerals Festival” incorporates a heritage tourism component focused on the role of Route 60 in connecting isolated mining communities to broader markets and visitor traffic.
Physical preservation remains challenging due to the practical demands of modern transportation needs, but several notable successes demonstrate viable approaches. The relocation and restoration of a Valentine Diner building formerly located along Route 60 near Miami to the Superstition Mountain Museum in Apache Junction exemplifies how threatened structures can be preserved through creative partnerships between historical organizations. Similarly, the rehabilitation of the 1934 Salt River Canyon Bridge to accommodate modern traffic while maintaining its historical character shows how transportation infrastructure can serve both contemporary needs and preservation goals.
For communities seeking to leverage their Route 60 heritage, the “Historic Highways of Arizona” initiative launched in 2015 provides technical assistance for interpretive planning, architectural preservation, and heritage tourism development. This program, coordinated through Arizona State University’s School of Geographical Sciences with support from the Arizona Office of Tourism, has helped several communities develop driving guides, interpretive signage, and preservation plans for significant structures along the historic route.
For contemporary explorers interested in experiencing the ghost of historic Route 60, several approaches offer meaningful connections to this transportation heritage. While the highway remains an active route across much of Arizona, the character and historical integrity of different segments vary dramatically, requiring strategic exploration to engage with its most significant aspects.
Eastern Arizona presents the most authentic experience of the historic highway. Between Springerville and Show Low, Route 60 retains its character as a two-lane road winding through small communities and forests, with physical infrastructure including bridges, culverts, and roadside features dating to the 1930s improvement campaigns. The Salt River Canyon segment offers not only spectacular scenery but also important engineering features including the 1934 bridge and original stone guardrails that demonstrate early highway safety designs.
The central section between Superior and Phoenix presents a study in contrasts between preserved segments and modernized corridors. The Queen Creek-Superior segment maintains much of its historic character, with the road following natural contours through dramatic terrain. Travelers can still experience the narrow passages and sweeping vistas that challenged and delighted earlier generations, though safety improvements have softened some of the most dangerous curves. By contrast, the segment between Apache Junction and Phoenix has been completely transformed into a modern freeway, though observant travelers can spot the original alignment running parallel as a local service road in some sections.
Western Arizona offers perhaps the most poignant ghost highway experience, as much of historic Route 60 between Wickenburg and the Colorado River has been superseded by Interstate 10. Travelers following the original alignment will find themselves on what are now secondary highways and county roads, passing through communities that have significantly contracted after being bypassed. In this section, abandonment and repurposing of highway-oriented businesses creates the characteristic landscape of ghost transportation corridors.
Several museums along the route offer exhibits specifically addressing highway heritage. The Arizona History Museum in Tucson maintains an extensive collection of photographs, maps, and ephemera related to early highway travel, including material documenting Route 60. The Superstition Mountain Museum near Apache Junction features both artifacts and a relocated Valentine Diner building, providing tangible connections to roadside culture during the highway’s heyday.
For those seeking deeper engagement, specialized guides like “Arizona’s Historic Highways” provide detailed information about original alignments, surviving structures, and historical context. The Arizona State University Library’s digital collection “Motorways of the American West” includes maps, photographs, and personal accounts specifically addressing travel along Route 60, creating a rich resource for understanding the highway’s evolution and significance.
The ghost of U.S. Route 60—whether existing as an active modern highway, a repurposed local road, or merely a memory marked by abandoned businesses—continues to influence Arizona’s landscape and communities. Though overshadowed in popular culture by its more famous sibling Route 66, this significant transportation corridor played an equally important role in connecting Arizona to the nation and shaping development patterns that persist into the present.
The highway’s legacy extends far beyond its physical infrastructure. Route 60 fundamentally altered settlement patterns, strengthening existing communities while enabling new developments predicated on automotive mobility. The corridor it established continues to influence transportation planning, with modern improvements often following alignments pioneered by early highway engineers who worked with limited technology but intimate knowledge of the landscape.
For communities along the former route, Route 60 represents both historical heritage and ongoing economic opportunity. Towns that successfully adapted to changing transportation patterns have incorporated their highway heritage into contemporary identity, using historic main streets and restored roadside architecture to attract heritage tourism while serving modern travelers. Others continue to struggle with the consequences of bypassing, their commercial landscapes featuring the characteristic abandoned motels and repurposed gas stations that testify to transportation’s economic impermanence.
Perhaps most significantly, Route 60 offers perspective on our contemporary transportation networks. Today’s high-speed corridors may eventually face similar obsolescence as technologies and travel patterns continue to evolve. The repurposed segments and abandoned roadside businesses of Route 60 remind us that even the most essential infrastructure eventually becomes historical artifact—a humbling lesson in the transience of what we create.
As the desert sun sets over the scattered remnants of this historic transportation corridor, we’re reminded that highways, like the civilizations that build them, leave traces that long outlast their practical function. The ghost of Route 60 continues to whisper its stories to those who pause to listen—tales of ambitious engineering, roadside entrepreneurship, cross-country adventure, and the transformative power of enhanced mobility in reshaping both landscape and society.